Methodology
Several identity signals. One reviewable report.
CheaterBusting checks supported public or available signals across selected apps, then explains why each candidate may or may not match.
- Private search
- No passwords
- Confidence notes
- Lawful use only
Private report
Sample · details hidden
Sample report
Possible match found
- Name matchStrong
- Same cityPartial
- Recently activeYes
- Photo matchMaybe
- How sure we are76%
- RememberNot proof on its own
Where we looked
This is a sample. Real names, photos, and details are always hidden.
1. Search brief
The customer provides identity details, approximate age, likely areas, selected apps, and recent photos. Weak or missing inputs are kept visible.
2. Candidate review
Potential profiles are compared across independent details. One matching name or one similar photo is not enough for certainty.
3. Confidence notes
The report separates aligned clues, conflicts, missing evidence, and freshness context.
4. Monitoring
Active plans repeat supported checks over time and can surface visible changes. Repeat checks remain limited by app coverage and available evidence.
5. Human interpretation
Customers review evidence and uncertainty. CheaterBusting does not decide whether someone cheated.
Does the method use private app APIs?
Why use several signals?
Create a stronger search brief.
Set up the private search first. Pay only when your details are ready.